Os sentidos do anacronismo

Bruno Gonçalves

doi:10.15848/hh.v15i38.1829

Autores

Bruno Gonçalves USP/Doutorando https://orcid.org/

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15848/hh.v15i38.1829

Palavras-chave:

Anacronismo, Conceito de História, Teoria e História da Historiografia

Resumo

O objetivo deste balanço é sintetizar o que foi escrito nas últimas décadas sobre o conceito de anacronismo em diferentes campos do conhecimento. O panorama oferecido revela que o anacronismo compreende vários significados (dentre eles: atribuição conceitual, ferramenta heurística, tabu profissional e índice de consciência histórica) e que existem estratégias para lidar com ele (criação de tipologias e critérios de admissão, reafirmação do tabu, crítica radical, entre outras). Além disso, o conceito desempenha papel de grande importância nas disputas intelectuais, cuja reflexão oferece uma ocasião privilegiada para o exercício de poder sobre a historiografia. Conclui-se que o anacronismo é um conceito polissêmico, duradouro e polêmico, e que seu valor normativo parece comprometer o estudo de sua história.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Referências

ARAVAMUDAN, Srinivas. The return of anachronism. Modern Language Quarterly, Durham, v. 64, n. 4, 2001. p. 331-354.

ARNOVICK, Leslie K. It’s a sign of times: uses of anachronism in medieval drama and postmodern novel. Studia Neophilologica, [s. l.], v. 65, n. 2, 1993. p. 157-168.

BARNES, Annette; BARNES, Jonathan. Time out of joint: some reflections on anachronism. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, Oxford, v. 47, n. 3, 1989. p. 253-261.

BARROS, José d’Assunção. Os conceitos na história: considerações sobre o anacronismo. Ler História, Lisboa, v. 71, 2017. p. 155-180.

BEVIR, Mark. Porque a distância histórica não é um problema. História da Historiografia, Ouro Preto, v. 18, 2015. p. 11-28.

BEVIR, Mark. When can we apply our concepts to the past? Scientia Poetica, Berlin, v. 8, 2004. p. 282-287.

BLAAS, Piet B. M. Continuity and anachronism: parliamentary and constitutional development in whig historiography and in the anti-whig reaction between 1890 and 1930. Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1978.

BLAAS, Piet B. M. Some general remarks after thirty years. Scientia Poetica, Berlin, v. 10, 2006. p. 332-336.

BRUSH, Stephen G. Anachronism and the History of Science: Copernicus as an airplane passenger. Scientia Poetica, Berlin, v. 8, 2004. p. 255-264.

BOWMAN, Matthew. Shapes of time: melancholia, anachronism, and de-distancing. In: BOETZKES, Amanda; VINEGAR, Aron (orgs.). Heidegger and the work of art history. Farnham: Ashgate, 2014. p. 173-194.

BURKE, Peter. A short history of distance. In: PHILLIPS, Mark S.; CAINE, Barbara; THOMAS, Julia Adeney (orgs). Rethinking historical distance. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013a. p. 21-33.

BURKE, Peter. Exemplarity and anti-exemplarity in early modern Europe. In: LIANERI, A. (org.). The Western time of ancient history: historiographical encounters with the Greek and Roman pasts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011. p. 48-59.

BURKE, Peter. O conceito de anacronismo de Petrarca a Poussin. Política & Trabalho, João Pessoa, v. 39, 2013b. p. 195-220.

BURKE, Peter. The Renaissance sense of the past. London: Edward Arnold, 1969.

BURKE, Peter. Triumphs and poverties of anachronism. Scientia Poetica, Berlin, v. 10, 2006. p. 291-298.

CHAMPION, Matthew S. A fuller history of temporalities. Past and Present, Oxford, v. 243, 2019a. p. 255-266.

CHAMPION, Matthew S. The history of temporalities: an introduction. Past and Present, Oxford, v. 243, 2019b. p. 247-254.

CONDREN, Conal. A reflection on the problem of anachronism in intellectual history. Scientia Poetica, Berlin, v. 8, 2004. p. 288-293.

CONDREN, Conal. Political theory and the problem of anachronism. In: VINCENT, Andrew (org.). Political theory: tradition and diversity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997. p. 45-66.

DASTON, Lorraine. The center cannot hold. Scientia Poetica, Berlin, v. 10, 2006. p. 231-236.

DIDI-HUBERMAN, Georges. A história da arte como disciplina anacrônica. Diante do tempo: história da arte e anacronismo das imagens. Tradução de Vera Casa Nova e Márcia Arbex. Belo Horizonte: Editora UFMG, 2017. p. 15-68.

DOSSE, François. De l’usage raisonné de l’anachronisme. Espaces Temps, [s. l.], v. 87-88, 2005. p. 156-171.

DUCHEYNE, Steffen. Ascribing contemporary scientific concepts to past thinkers: towards a frame-work for handling matters more precisely. Scientia Poetica, Berlin, v. 10, 2006. p. 274-290.

EBELING, Herman. The word anachronism. Modern Language Notes, [Baltimore], v. 52, n. 2, 1937. p. 120-121.

FEBVRE, Lucien. O problema da incredulidade no século XVI: a religião de Rabelais. Tradução de Maria Lúcia Machado. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras, 2009.

FISCHER, David Hackett. Historians’ fallacies: towards a logic of historical thought. New York: Harper Perennial, 1970.

FLORES, Maria Bernadete Ramos. Elogio ao anacronismo: para os andróginos de Ismael Nery. Topoi, Rio de Janeiro, v. 15, n. 29, 2014. p. 414-443.

FRYXELL, Allegra R.P. Time and the modern: current trends in the history of modern temporalities. Past and Present, Oxford, v. 243, 2019. p. 285-298.

GASKILL, Malcolm. Time’s arrows. Scientia Poetica, Berlin, v. 10, 2006. p. 237-252.

GINZBURG, Carlo. De A. Warburg a E.H. Gombrich: notas sobre um problema de método. In: GINZBURG, Carlo. Mitos, emblemas e sinais: morfologia e história. Tradução de Federico Carotti. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras, 2007a. p. 41-93.

GINZBURG, Carlo. Sinais: raízes de um paradigma indiciário. In: GINZBURG, Carlo. Mitos, emblemas e sinais: morfologia e história. Tradução de Federico Carotti. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras, 2007b. p. 143-179.

GINZBURG, Carlo. Our words, and theirs: a reflection on the historian’s craft, today. In: FELLMAN, S; RAHIKAINEN, M. (orgs.). Historical knowledge: in quest of theory, method and evidence. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2012. p. 97-119.

GRAZIA, Margreta de. Anachronism. In: CUMMINGS, Brian; SIMPSON, James. (org.) Cultural Reformations: Medieval and Renaissance in Literary History. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010. p. 13-32.

GREENE, Thomas M. Le texte vulnérable: essais sur la littérature de la Renaissance. Tradução de Max Vernet. Paris: Champion, 2002.

GREENE, Thomas M. Imitation and anachronism. Light in Troy: imitation and discovery in Renaissance poetry. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1982. p. 28-53.

HADDOCK, Adrian. Anachronism and the individuation of concepts. Scientia Poetica, Berlin, v. 8, 2004. p. 265-272.

HANß, Stefan. The fetish of accuracy: perspectives on early modern time(s). Past and Present, Oxford, v. 243, 2019. p. 267-284.

HOBSBAWM, Eric. Dentro e fora da história. Sobre história. Tradução de Cid Knipel Moreira. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras, 1998. p. 13-21.

HUNT, Lynn. Against presentism. Perspectives on History: the newsmagazine of the American Historical Association, 2002. Disponível em: https://bit.ly/2Qhb6RZ Acesso em: 10 de jul. de 2020.

JARDINE, Nick. Uses and abuses of anachronism in the history of the sciences. History of Science, [s. l.], v. 38, n. 3, 2000. p. 251-270.

KOSELLECK, Reinhardt. Futuro passado: contribuição à semântica dos tempos históricos. Tradução de Wilma Patrícia Maas e Carlos Almeida Pereira. Rio de Janeiro: Contraponto, Editora PUC Rio, 2006.

KOSELLECK, Reinhardt et al. O conceito de história. Tradução de René E. Gertz. Belo Horizonte: Autêntica, 2016.

LANDWEHR, Achim; WINNERLING, Tobias. Chronisms: on the past and future of the relation of times. Rethinking History, [s. l.], v. 23, n. 4, 2019. p. 435-455.

LESLIE, Margaret. In defense of anachronism. Political Studies, [s. l.], v. 18, n. 4, 1970. p. 433-447.

LORAUX, Nicole. Elogio do anacronismo. In: NOVAES, Adauto. (org.) Tempo e história. São Paulo: Secretaria Municipal de Cultura, Companhia das Letras, 1992. p. 57-70.

LUZZI, Joseph. The rethoric of anachronism. Comparative Literature, Durham, v. 61, n. 1, 2009. p. 69-84.

LYNCH, William T. The utility of the present in reconstructing science’s past: historical counterfactuals and contemporary possibilities. Scientia Poetica, Berlin, v. 8, 2004. p. 241-250.

MALDONADO CHAVES, Maria Eugenia. El anacronismo en la historia: ¿error o possibilidad? A proposito de las reflexiones sobre el tiempo em Carlo Ginzburg, Marc Bloch y Georges Didi-Huberman. Historia y Sociedad, Medellin, v. 30, 2016. p. 45-73.

MITROVIC, Branko. Attribution of concepts and problems with anachronism. History and Theory, Middletown, v. 50, 2011. p. 303-327.

MOST, Glenn W. Anachronisms. Scientia Poetica, Berlin, v. 8, 2004. p. 294-297.

NAGEL, Alexander; WOOD, Christopher. Anachronic Renaissance. New York: Zone Books, 2010.

NAGEL, Alexander; WOOD, Christopher. Towards a new model of Renaissance anachronism. Art Bulletin, New York, v. 87, n. 3, 2005. p. 403-415.

OGLE, Vanessa. Time, temporality and the history of capitalism. Past and Present, Oxford, v. 243, 2019. p. 312-327.

OLDROYD, David. Anachronism and the ‘history wars’ in Australia. Scientia Poetica, Berlin, v. 10, 2006. p. 337-365.

OLIVEIRA, Gustavo Ponciano Cunha de. A tipologia do anacronismo em Borges. Remate dos Malês, Campinas, v. 36, n. 1, 2016. p. 219-237.

PALONEN, Kari. Reinhardt Koselleck on translation, anachronism and conceptual change. In: BURKE, Martin; RICHTER, Melvin. (org.) Why concepts matter: translating social and political thought. Leiden: Brill, 2012. p. 73-92.

PRUDOVSKY, Gad. Can we ascribe to past thinkers concepts they had no linguistic means to express? History and Theory, Middletown, v. 36, n. 1, 1997. p. 15-31.

RANCIÈRE, Jacques. O conceito de anacronismo e a verdade do historiador. In: SALOMON, Marlon (org.). História, verdade e tempo. Chapecó: Argos, 2011. p. 21-49.

ROOD, Tim; ATACK, Carol; PHILIPS, Tom. Anachronism and antiquity. London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2020.

RUBIN, Miri. Presentism’s useful anachronisms. Past and Present, Oxford, v. 234, 2017. p. 236-244.

SCHIFFMAN, Zachary Sayre. Renaissance. The birth of the past. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press, 2011. p. 138-198.

SILVA OLARTE, Renán. Del anacronismo en Historia y en Ciencias Sociales. Historia Critica, Bogotá, 2009. p. 278-299.

ŠPELDA, Daniel. Anachronisms in the History of Science: an attempt at a typology. Almagest, Turnhout, v. 3, n. 2, 2012. p. 91-119.

SYRJÄMÄKI, Sami. Sins of a historian: perspectives on the problem of anachronism. 2011. Dissertação – School of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finlândia, 2011.

SKINNER, Quentin. Meaning and understanding in the History of Ideas. History and Theory, [Middletown], v. 8, n. 1, 1969. p. 3-53.

SPOERHASE, Carlos. Zwischen den zeiten: anachronismus und präsentismus in der methologie der historischen wissenschaften. Scientia Poetica, Berlin, v. 8, 2004. p. 169-240.

STOLL, Elmer Edgar. Anachronism in Shakespeare criticism. Modern Philology, [Chicago], v. 7, n. 4, 1910. p. 557-575.

STRAND, Daniel. A plea for anachronism. In: KÄLLÉN, Anna (org.). Making Cultural History: new perspectives on Western heritage. Lund: Nordic Academic Press, 2013. p. 141-150.

TAMBLING, Jeremy. On anachronism. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2010.

TOLENTINO GARCIA, J. Adrán. La observación del anacronismo: uma llave para la ética historiadora. Historiografias, [Zaragoza], v. 14, 2017. p. 34-50.

TOSH, Nick. Anachronism and retrospective explanation: in defence of a present-centred history of science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, [s. l.], v. 34, 2003. p. 647-659.

TUCKER, Aviezer. Temporal provincialism: anachronism, retrospection and evidence. Scientia Poetica, Berlin, v. 10, 2006. p. 299-317.

VOIGT, André Fabiano. Qual a importância de uma época: anacronismo e história. Anos 90, Porto Alegre, v. 24, n. 46, 2017. p. 23-44.