The Social Role of History and the Question of Egalitarian Historical Writing

Jakub Muchowski

doi:10.15848/hh.v17.2243

Autores

Jakub Muchowski Jagiellonian University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15848/hh.v17.2243

Palavras-chave:

Reading contract, Social role of history, Postcritique

Resumo

In this paper, I address a question relevant for the social role of history, namely: what relation between historical studies and society can be established by egalitarian historical writing? Drawing on the contributions of María Inés La Greca, Zoltán Boldizsár Simon, and Kalle Pihlainen, I critically discuss how contemporary historical theory responds to this question in the debate on Hayden White’s distinction between historical past and practical past. By discussing the three theorists’ contributions, I show that the relationship between historians and their audiences produced in them is asymmetrical. All of them, albeit varying degrees, describe historical writing as acts of communication in which historians are placed in the position of those who know better and act, while readers are assigned the position of those who are less well informed and who should submit to the actions of historians. Using the resources of postcritique, I point to the need for theoretical elaboration—the construction of instruments and concepts to handle the question of producing democratic relations in historical writing. In conclusion, I suggest a brief description of the democratic reading contract of historical writing based on the concept of receptivity.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Referências

AHLBÄCK, Pia M. The Reader! The Reader! The Mimetic Challenge of Addressivity and Response in Historical Writing, Storia della Storiografia 52 (2007): 31–48.

ANKER, Elisabeth S.; Rita Felski. Introduction, in Elisabeth S. Anker, Rita Felski (eds), Critique and Postcritique. Duke University Press: Durham and London, 2017, p. 10-17, 19-21.

CATLIN, Jonathon. ‘To Intervene yet again’: Theory Revolt, Live!, Journal of History of Ideas Blog 2018.

COHEN, Deborah, Peter MANDLER. The History Manifesto: A Critique, American Historical Review 120, no. 1 (2015), p. 530-542.

CROW, Matthew. Context as Environment: A ‘Workmanlike’ Approach. History of the Present 2020, 10 (1): 169–171.

DOMANSKA, Ewa. (2022). The Paternalistic Liberation of History by Theory: A libertação paternalística da História pela teoria. Caminhos Da História, 27(2), 7–16. https://doi.org/10.46551/issn.2317-0875v27n2p.7-16

FELSKI, Rita. Hooked: Art and Attachment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2021.

FELSKI, Rita. The Limits of Critique. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2015.

FELSKI, Rita. Uses of Literature, New Jersey: Blackwell Publishing, 2008.

FISH, Stanley. Interpreting the Variorum, in Jane P. Tompkins (ed.), Reader-Response Criticism. From Formalism to Post-Structuralism. The Johns Hopkins University Press: Baltimore and London, 1980), 164-184.

FRANCIS, Matthew; Nick Funke; David Gange; Chris Hill; Matthew Hilton; Matt Houlbrook; Andrew Jones; Chris Moores; Daisy Payling; Jonathan Reinarz; Laura Sefton; Kate Smith; Silas Webb and Simon Yarrow, Responding to The History Manifesto, November 2014, http://mbsbham.wordpress.com/responding-to-the-history-manifesto/

GILBERT, Bennett. Theory of After All, ¡Philosophy of History No ! 11.06.2018.

GULDI, Jo; David ARMITAGE. The History Manifesto. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.

HANDEL, John. The Principle of Theory: Or, Theory in the Eyes of its Students, Journal of History of Ideas Blog 2018, October 8.

KLEINBERG, Ethan; Joan SCOTT; Gary WILDER, Theses on Theory and History, 2018, http://theoryrevolt.com/

KOMPRIDIS, Nikolas. Receptivity, Possibility, and Democratic Politics, Ethics and Global Politics 4, no. 2 (2011): 255–272.

KOMPRIDIS, Nikolas. Recognition and Receptivity: Forms of Normative Response in the Lives of the Animals We Are. New Literary History, vol. 44, no. 1, 2013, pp. 1–24.

KOMPRIDIS, Nikolas. Critique and Disclosure. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2006.

LA GRECA, María Inés, Hayden White and Joan W. Scott’s Feminist History: The Practical past, the Political Present and an Open Future”, Rethinking History 20, 3 (2016): 395–413.

LA GRECA, María Inés, Narrative Trouble, or Hayden White’s Desire for a Progressive Historiography Refigured by Judith Butler’s Performativity Theory, Storia della Storiografia 65, 1 (2014): 117–129.

MCLEMEE, Scott. Theory in Revolt Now Thunders, Inside Higher Ed 2018, June 1.

MICHEALS, Walter Benn, The Interpreter’s Self: Peirce on the Cartesian , in Jane P. Tompkins (ed.), ReaderResponse Criticism. From Formalism to Post-Structuralism. The Johns Hopkins University Press: Baltimore and London, 1980, 185-200.

MUCHOWSKI, Jakub. The Death of the Historian and Autotelism, Textuality and Impotence of Historical Writing: Hayden White and the Autonomy of History, Historyka, Studia Metodologiczne 51 (Special): 117-130.

NORVAL, Aletta J. A Democratic Politics of Acknowledgement: Political Judgment, Imagination and Exemplarity’, Diacritics 38, no. 4 (2010): 59–76.

PEDEN, Knox. What Is to Be Done?, Los Angeles Review of Books. February 18, 2015, http://lareviewofbooks.org/review/done/

PIHLAINEN, Kalle, The Distinction of History: On Valuing the Insularity of the Historical Past, Rethinking History, 20:3 (2016): 414–432.

PIHLAINEN, Kalle. The Work of History. New York: Routledge, 2017.

PINTO, P. Ramos. History Manifested: A Commentary on Continuity, Disruption and the Production of History, European Review of History 2015, 22:5, 835-838.

RANCIÈRE, Jacques. Philosopher and His Poor, trans. John Drury, Corinne Oster, Andrew Parker. Durham: Duke University Press, 2003.

RANCIÈRE, Jacques. The Emancipated Spectator, trans. Gregory Elliott. Verso: London, 2011.

RANCIÈRE, Jacques. The Flesh of Words. The Politics of Writing, trans. Charlotte Mandell. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2004.

RANCIÈRE, Jacques. The Names of History: On Poetics of Knowledge, trans. H. Melehy. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1994.

SIMON, Zoltán Boldizsár. History Manifested: Making Sense of Unprecedented Change, European Review of History 22, 5 (2015): 819–834.

SIMON, Zoltán Boldizsár. The Limits of Anthropocene Narratives. European Journal of Social Theory 2020, 23(2):184–199.

SPIEGEL, Gabrielle M. Above, About and Beyond the Writing of History: A Retrospective View of Hayden White’s Metahistory on the 40th Anniversary of Its Publication, Rethinking History 17, 4 (2013): 492–508.

WHITE, Hayden. The Practical Past, in Hayden White, The Practical Past. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 2014, 3–24.

ZUKAS, Alex. The History Guild Manifesto, H-Socialisms (October 2015), http://www.hnet.org/reviews/showpdf.php?id=42836.