The Possibilities of ‘Materiality’ in Writing and Reading History

Kalle Pihlainen

doi:10.15848/hh.v12i31.1527

Authors

Kalle Pihlainen Tallinn University https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3361-5840

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15848/hh.v12i31.1527

Keywords:

Experience, Constructivism, Reception

Abstract

In this article, I investigate the role of a particular kind of ‘materiality’ at work in the writing and reading of history. This involves examining the challenges posed to constructivist approaches to history by various post-linguistic-turn claims about presence and experience as well as by so-called post-narrativism. The core focus will be on outlining an argument for updating ‘narrativist’ or constructivist theory of history to deal with these recent concerns. This requires directing more attention to the relations between author, text, and reader, particularly concerning the key issues of reality, embodiment, and immersion. To demonstrate the value of approaching these relations in terms of ‘materiality,’ I consider three questions aimed at illuminating the balancing act between referentiality and invention performed in history writing as a genre: How can language ‘embody’ reality? How do referential texts encode reality? And, how could we read referential texts specifically with respect to reality?

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

AHLBÄCK, Pia Maria. The Reader! The Reader! The Mimetic Challenge of Addressivity and Response in Historical Writing. Storia della Storiografia, v. 52, n. 1, p. 31–48, 2007.

ANKERSMIT, Frank. Sublime Historical Experience. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2005.

BARTHES, Roland. The Pleasure of the Text. Translated by Richard Miller. London: Jonathan Cape, 1975.

BUTLER, Judith. Excitable Speech: A Politics of the Performative. New York: Routledge, 1997.

CARR, David. Narrative and the Real World: An Argument for Continuity. History and Theory, v. 25 n. 2, p. 117–131, 1986. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2505301

CHORELL, Torbjörn Gustafsson. F. R. Ankersmit and the Historical Sublime. History of the Human Sciences, v. 19, n. 4, p. 91–102, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0952695106072868

CIXOUS, Hélène. The Laugh of the Medusa. Translated by Keith Cohen and Paula Cohen. Signs, v. 1, n. 4, p. 875–893, 1976. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/493306

DAVIES, Martin L. How History Works: The Reconstitution of a Human Science. London: Routledge, 2016.

DAVIS, Natalie Zemon. Women on the Margins: Three Seventeenth-Century Lives. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1995.

DERRIDA, Jacques. On Touch — Jean-Luc Nancy. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2005

DOMANSKA, Ewa. Frank Ankersmit: From Narrative to Experience. Rethinking History, v. 13, n. 2, p. 175–195, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13642520902833809

FROEYMAN, Anton. History, Ethics, and the Recognition of the Other: A Levinasian View on the Writing of History. New York: Routledge, 2016.

GOODMAN, James. Blackout. New York: North Point Press, 2003.

GUMBRECHT, Hans Ulrich. In 1926: Living At the Edge of Time. Cambridge, MA & London: Harvard University Press, 1997.

GUMBRECHT, Hans Ulrich. Production of Presence: What Meaning Cannot Convey. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2004.

ICKE, Peter P. Frank Ankersmit’s Lost Historical Cause: A Journey from Language to Experience. New York: Routledge, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203723791

IRIGARAY, Luce. This Sex Which Is Not One. Translated by Catherine Porter with Carolyn Burke. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1985.

JENKINS, Keith. “Nobody Does It Better”: Radical History and Hayden White. Rethinking History, v. 12, n. 1, p. 59–74, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13642520701838827

KUUKKANEN, Jouni-Matti. Postnarrativist Philosophy of Historiography. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137409874

LAKOFF, George and Mark JOHNSON. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1980.

LEVINAS, Emmanuel. Totality and Infinity: An Essay on Exteriority. Translated by Alphonso Lingis. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press, 1969.

LUKÁCZ, Georg. The Historical Novel. Translated from the German by Hannah and Stanley Mitchell. London: Merlin Press, 1962 [1937].

MENEZES, Jonathan. Aftermaths of the Dawn of Experience: On the Impact of Ankersmit’s Sublime Historical Experience. Rethinking History, v. 22, n. 1, p. 44–64, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13642529.2017.1423009

MERLEAU-PONTY, Maurice. Phenomenology of Perception. Translated by Colin Smith. London: Routledge, 2002 [1962]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203994610

NANCY, Jean-Luc. The Birth to Presence. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1993.

NORTON, Claire & Mark DONNELLY. Liberating Histories. London: Routledge, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351005869

PAUL, Herman & Adriaan VAN VELDHUIZEN. A Retrieval of Historicism: Frank Ankersmit’s Philosophy of History and Politics. History and Theory, v. 57, n. 1, p. 33–55, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/hith.12045

PIHLAINEN, Kalle. The Work of History: Constructivism and a Politics of the Past. New York: Routledge, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315521619

PIHLAINEN, Kalle. Committed Writing: History and Narrative Communication Revisited. In: BERGER, Stefan (ed.). The Engaged Historian: Perspectives on the Intersections of Politics, Activism and the Historical Profession. New York: Berghahn, 2019a, p. 63–78.

PIHLAINEN, Kalle. Experience, Materiality and the Rules of Past Writing: Interrogating Reference. Life Writing, v. 16, n. 4, p. 617–635, 2019b. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14484528.2019.1633251

ROTH, Paul. A. An Audience for History? Review Essay of Kalle Pihlainen’s The Work of History. Journal of the Philosophy of History, advance article, 2018. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1163/18722636-12341410. Accessed: 16 Dec 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/18722636-12341410

SARTRE, Jean-Paul. Being and Nothingness: An Essay on Phenomenological Ontology. Translated by Hazel E. Barnes. London: Methuen, 1969. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203827123

SCHMITT, Arnaud. The Phenomenology of Autobiography: Making It Real. New York: Routledge, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315173504

SCOTT, Joan W. The Evidence of Experience. Critical Inquiry, v. 17, n. 4, p. 773–797, 1991. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/448612

SPIVAK, Gayatri Chakravorty. The Post-Colonial Critic: Interviews, Strategies, Dialogues. Edited by Sarah Harasym. New York: Routledge. 1990.

TAMM, Marek. Truth, Objectivity and Evidence in History Writing. Journal of the Philosophy of History, v. 8, n. 2, p. 265–290, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/18722636-12341273

VAN DER DUSSEN, Jan. A Quest for the Real Past: Ankersmit on Historiography and (Sublime) Historical Experience. In: VAN DER DUSSEN, Jan. Studies on Collingwood, History and Civilization. Cham: Springer, 2016, p. 213–253.

WHITE, Hayden. Tropics of Discourse: Essays in Cultural Criticism. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1978.

ZAGORIN, Perez. Rejoinder to a Postmodernist. History and Theory, v. 39, n. 2, p. 201–209, 2000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/0018-2656.00123