Scholars on the hot seat, or ‘how does each one write History?’: the clash between academic and non-academic historians in Brazil in the light of the debates on Public History

Authors

  • Jurandir Malerba PUC-RS

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15848/hh.v0i15.692

Keywords:

Brazilian historiography, Public history, Theory of history

Abstract

Different indicators suggest an increasing demand for history by the lay audience in the recent years, a demand that has been supplied by authors without formal academic training. The objectives of this paper are to think the concept of public history and its applicability in Brazil, and to analyze the contributions of three lay authors who have become best sellers as writers of history in Brazil. Our argument is that the mass dissemination of these works has implications both from a technical and ethical standpoint, and that it is a task of university-trained historians to have a position in regard to them.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2014-05-08

How to Cite

MALERBA, J. Scholars on the hot seat, or ‘how does each one write History?’: the clash between academic and non-academic historians in Brazil in the light of the debates on Public History. História da Historiografia: International Journal of Theory and History of Historiography, Ouro Preto, v. 7, n. 15, p. 27–50, 2014. DOI: 10.15848/hh.v0i15.692. Disponível em: https://revistahh.emnuvens.com.br/revista/article/view/692. Acesso em: 21 nov. 2024.

Issue

Section

Article