The Analytical Metaphysics of Time and the Recent Theory of History
Overtones of the Debate about Presentism
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15848/hh.v14i35.1739Palabras clave:
Historical Time, Presentism, Philosophy of HistoryResumen
The longstanding line of research that the analytic tradition calls metaphysics of time remains quite ignored by the theory of history. To bring them closer, this study proposes to introduce to historians and theorists of history the metaphysics of time theses about the presentism/eternalism and the linear/closed time. For such purpose, we drew correspondences between the theory of history and the analytical metaphysics of time concerning some characteristics of the emerging concepts of historical time. These characteristics are related to the recent debate about presentism regarding the regimes of the historical time (multiple temporalities and pluritemporality); plural time in the analytical metaphysics and synchronous/asynchronous historical time; linear/closed time in the analytic tradition and being affected by historical time. As a result, this article presents how the analytical metaphysics of time theses disclose unnoticed contours related to the history theorists’ understanding about the relation with the past.
Descargas
Citas
ARAÚJO, Valdei Lopes de; PEREIRA, Mateus Henrique de Faria. Atualismo 1.0: como a ideia de atualização mudou o século XXI. Vitória: Editora Milfontes, 2019.
ARMITAGE, David. Defence of Presentism. In: MCMAHON, Darrin M. (ed.). History and Human Flourising. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020. Available at: https://scholar.harvard.edu/armitage/publications/defense-presentism. Accessed on: 30 Mar. 2020.
BECK, Humberto. El acontecimiento entre el presente y la historia. Desacatos. Revista de Ciencias Sociales, Ciudad de México, n. 55, p. 44-59, 2017.
BEVERNAGE, Berber. Time, Presence, and Historical Injustice. History and Theory, Middletown, v. 47, n. 2, p. 149-167, 2008.
BLOCKER, Déborah; HADDAD, Elie. “Le présent comme inquiétude: temporalités, écritures du temps et actions historiographiques”. Revue d’Histoire Moderne et Contemporaine, Paris, n. 53, 2006.
BONNEUIL, Noël. The Mathematics of Time in History. History and Theory, Middletown, v. 49, n. 4, p. 28-46, 2010.
BURGES, Joel; ELIAS, Amy J. Introduction: Time Studies Today. In: BURGES, Joel; ELIAS, Joel. Time: A Vocabulary of the Present. New York: New York University Press, 2016. p. 1-32.
CAMERON, Ross P. On Characterizing the Presentism/Eternalism and Actualism/Possibilism Debates. Analytic Philosophy, Hoboken, v. 57, n. 2, p. 110–140, 2016.
CARDOSO JR., Hélio R. Theoretical Innovations in Emerging Concepts of Historical Time, with a Closer Focus on the Continuity-Discontinuity Issue, draft paper, 2020.
CARDOSO JR., Hélio R. Événement and History: Deleuze’s Thought and Humanities’ Epistemological Issues. Trans/Form/Ação, São Paulo, v. 28, n. 2, 2005, p. 105-116.
CRISP, Thomas M. Presentism. In: LOUX, Michael J.; ZIMMERMAN, Dean W. The Oxford Handbook of Metaphysics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003. p. 211–245.
DELACROIX, Christian. “Généalogie d’une notion”. In: DELACROIX, Christian; DOSSE, François; GARCIA, Patrick (sous la direction de). Historicités. Paris: Éditions La Découverte, 2009. p. 29-45.
DENG, Natalja. Time, metaphysics of. In: Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. London: Routledge, 2018. Available at: https://www.rep.routledge.com/articles/thematic/time-metaphysics-of/v-3. Accessed on: 05 May 2020.
DOLEV, Yuval. Time and Realism: Metaphysical and Antimetaphysical Perspectives. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2007.
DUMMETT, Michael. Metaphysics of Time. In: DUMMETT, Michael. Truth and the Past. New York: Columbia University Press, 2004. p. 73-96.
FARELD, Victoria. (In) between the living and the dead: New perspectives on time in history. History Compass, Philadelphia, v. 14, n. 9, p. 430–440, 2016.
FARELD, Victoria. History, Justice and the Time of the Imprescriptible. In: HELGESSON, Stefan; SVENUNGSSON, Jayne. The Ethos of History Time and Responsibility. New York: Oxford, 2018. p. 54-69.
FIGG, Travis M. How to Understand the Debate over Presentism and Eternalism. 2017. Dissertation (Doctorate in Philosophy) – Graduate Scholl, Wayne State University, Detroit, 2017.
HANNOUM, Abdelmajid. “What is an order of time?”. History and Theory, Middletown, v. 47, n. 3, p. 458-471, oct. 2008.
HARTOG, François. Regimes of Historicity: Presentism and Experiences of Time. Transl. by Saskya Brown. New York: Columbia University Press, 2015.
HUNT, Lynn. Against Presentism. Perspectives on History, Washington, v. 40, n. 5, 2002. Available at: https://www.historians.org/publications-and-directories/perspectives-on-history/may-2002/against-presentism. Accessed on: 30 Mar. 2020.
INCLÁN, Daniel; VALERO, Aurelia. Reporte del tiempo: presente e historia. Desacatos. Revista de Ciencias Sociales, n. 55, p. 60-73, 2017.
JORDHEIM, Helge. Against Periodization: Koselleck’s Theory of Multiple Temporalities. History and Theory, Middletown, v. 51, n. 2, p. 151-171, 2012.
JORDHEIM, Helge. Introduction: Multiple Times and the Work of Synchronization. History and Theory, Middletown, v. 53, n.4, p. 498–518, 2014.
KASABOVA, Anita. Memory, memorials, and commemoration. History and Theory, v. 47, n. 3, p. 331-350, 2008.
KLEINBERG, Ethan. Introduction: The New Metaphysics of Time. History and Theory: Virtual Issue, Middletown, v. 1, p. 1-7, aug. 2012.
KOSELLECK, Reinhart. Futures Past: On the Semantics of Historical Time. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1985.
LANDWEHR, Achim. Von der ‘Gleichzeitigkeit des Ungleichzeitigen’. Historische Zeitschrift, Frankfurt, v. 295, n. 1, p. 1-34, 2012.
LE POIDEVIN, Robin. Relationism and Temporal Topology: Physics or Metaphysics? In: POIDEVIN, Robin le; MACBEATH, Murray. The Philosophy of Time. New York: Oxford University Press, 1993. p. 149-169.
LE POIDEVIN, Robin. Travels in Four Dimensions: The Enigmas of Space and Time. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press, 2003.
LORAUX, Nicole. Éloge de l‘anachronisme en histoire. Espaces Temps, Paris, v. 87-88, p. 127-139, 2005.
MCTAGGART, J. McT. E. Time: An Excerpt from the Nature of Existence. In: INWAGEN, Peter Van; ZIMMERMAN, Dean W. Metaphysics: The Big Questions. Malden: Blackwell, 1998. p. 67–74.
MCCUMBER, John. The Baffling ‘Nature’ of Time. Parrhesia, Melbourne, n. 15, p. 14-23, 2012.
MUDROVCIC, María Inés. “Regímenes de historicidad y regímenes historiográficos: del pasado histórico al pasado presente”. Historiografías: revista de historia y teory, Zaragoza, n. 5, p. 11-31, 2013.
NICOLAZZI, Fernando. História entre Tempos: François Hartog e A Conjuntura Historiográfica Contemporânea. História: Questões & Debates, Curitiba, n. 53, p. 229-257, jul./dez. 2010.
OAKLANDER, Nathan L. Introduction. In: OAKLANDER, Nathan L. Debates in the Metaphysics of Time. London/New York: Bloomsbury, 2014. p. x-xiv.
ORESKES, Naomi. Why I Am a Presentist. Science in Context, Cambridge, v. 26, n. 4, p. 595–609, 2013.
PAUL, Herman. Key issues in historical theory. New York: Routledge, 2015.
RAMALHO, Walderez. Historical time between Chronos and Kairos: on the historicity of The Kairos Document manifesto, South Africa, 1985. Rethinking History, v. 24, n. 3-4, p. 465-480, 2020. Available at: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13642529.2020.1831351. Accessed on: 05 January 2021.
REA, Michael C. Four-Dimensionalism. In: LOUX, Michael J. ; ZIMMERMAN, Dean W. The Oxford Handbook of Metaphysics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003. p. 246–280.
REYNOLDS, Jack. Time, Philosophy, and Chronopathologies. Parrhesia, Melbourne, v. 15, p. 64-80, 2012.
ROTH, Paul A. The Pasts. History and Theory, Middletown, v. 51, n. 3, p. 313-339, 2012.
RUNIA, Eelco. Presence. History and Theory, Middletown, v. 45, n. 1, p. 1-29, 2006.
SAUNDERS, Simon. How Relativity Contradicts Presentism. In: CALLENDER, Craig. Time, Reality & Experience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002. p. 277-292.
SIDER, Theodore. Introduction. In: SIDER, Theodore; HAWTHORNE, John; ZIMMERMAN, Dean W. Contemporary Debates in Metaphysics. Malden: Blackwell Publishing, 2008. p. 1-7.
SIMON, Zoltán B. The Transformation of Historical Time. Processual and Evental Temporalities. In: TAMM, Marek; OLIVIER, Laurent. Rethinking Historical Time: New Approaches to Presentism. London/New York: Bloomsbury Publishing, 2019. p. 71-84.
TAMM, Marek; OLIVIER, Laurent. Introduction. In: TAMM, Marek; OLIVIER, Laurent. Rethinking Historical Time: New Approaches to Presentism. London/New York: Bloomsbury Publishing, 2019. p. 1-22.
TURIN, Rodrigo. Presentismo, neoliberalismo e os fins da história. In: AVILA, A.; NICOLAZZI, Fernando; TURIN, Rodrigo. A História (in)Disciplinada: Teoria, ensino e difusão de conhecimento histórico. Vitória: Milfontes, 2019a. p. 245-270.
TURIN, Rodrigo. Tempos de transição: aceleração e dessincronização social. In: VÁSQUEZ, Georgiane Garabely Heil; DENIPOTI, Cláudio. Tempos de Transição. Porto Alegre, RS: Editora Fi, 2019b. p. 19-37.
TURIN, Rodrigo. As (des)classificações do tempo: linguagens teóricas, historiografia e normatividade. Topoi, Rio de Janeiro, v. 17, n. 33, p. 586-601, 2016.
WALSHAM, Alexandra. Past and… Presentism. Past & Present, Oxford, v. 234, n. 1, p. 213–17, 2017.
WELCH, Evelyn. Presentism and the Renaissance and Early Modern Historian. Past & Present, Oxford, v. 234, n. 1, p. 245–253, 2017.
ZAMMITO, John. Koselleck’s Philosophy of Historical Time(s) and the Practice of History. History and Theory, Middletown, v. 43, n. 1, p. 124-135, 2004.
ZIMMERMAN, Dean. The Privileged Present: Defending an “A-Theory” of Time”. In: SIDER, Theodore; HAWTHORNE, John; ZIMMERMAN, Dean W. Contemporary Debates in Metaphysics. Malden: Blackwell Publishing, 2008. p. 211-225.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Los autores son los poseedores de los derechos de autor de los manuscritos enviados. Se autoriza a la revista História da Historiografia: International Journal for Theory and History of Historiography la realización de la publicación del referido texto. Los datos, conceptos y opiniones presentados en los trabajos, así como la exactitud de las referencias documentales y bibliográficas, son de entera responsabilidad de los autores.
Este trabajo está licenciado con una licencia Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.