Ji Chaoding's Key Economic Areas

a discreet challenge from a Chinese Marxist to Eurocentrism in historiography

Authors

  • Christine Dabat Universidade Federal de Pernambuco

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15848/hh.v17.2183

Keywords:

Ancient China, History of Theory and Historiography, Marxism

Abstract

Historiographical Eurocentrism is an obstacle to study the past and, therefore, the future of many regions in the world. Great Marxist intellectuals and militants offered original perspectives on their countries’ history, such as Caio Prado Jr. in Brazil and Ji Chaoding in China. Ji Chaoding”s main work, Key Economic Areas in Chinese History as Revealed in the Development of Public Works for Water control (1936), gave a discreet solution to Comintern”s official position – “feudal mode of production” – with implications for the revolutionary project, especially in terms of class alliances. At a very difficult time for his home country, the economist proposed a detailed description of Chinese economic history until 1842. He used the concept of Key Economic Area, thus rating positively the wealth and sophistication of social organization in classical China, especially as far as managing res publica, including in rural areas, against considerable environmental challenges. Such preoccupation echoes debates in the international communist movement and even today in academia.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

BILLETER, Jean-François. Contre François Jullien. Paris: Allia, 2006.

BLAUT, James Morris. The Colonizer’s Model of the World: Geographical Diffusionism and Eurocentric History. New York/London: The Guilford Press, 1993.

BLOCH, Marc. A sociedade feudal. Tradução de Liz Silva. Lisboa: Ed. 70, 1998.

BROUÉ, Pierre (Ed.). La question chinoise dans l´internationale communiste (1926-27). Paris : EDI, 1965.

BROUÉ, Pierre. História da Internacional Comunista 1919-1943. V. 1 A ascensão e a queda. São Paulo : Sundermann, 2007.

CERM. Sur le ‘mode de production asiatique’. Paris : Ed. Sociales, 1974.

CHESNEAUX, Jean. Du passé faisons table rase? A propos de l’histoire et des historiens. Paris : Maspéro, 1976.

CHEVRIER, Yves. Mort et transfiguration : le modèle russe dans la révolution chinoise. Extrême-Orient, Extrême-Occident, 1983, n°2. L’idée révolutionnaire et la Chine : la question du modèle. pp. 41-108. http//www.persee.fr/doc/oroc_0754-5010_1983_num_2_2_887. Acessado em 8 junho 2019.

CHI Chao-ting. Key Economic Areas in Chinese. History as revealed in the Development of Public Works for Water-control. New York: Parangon Reprint Corp. 1963.

COHEN, Bernard S. Representing authority in Victorian India. HOBSBAWM, Eric & Terence RANGER. The invention of tradition. Cambridge : Cambridge UP, 1992.

DABAT, Christine Rufino. A escolha dos ancestrais ou notas sobre o curioso itinerário geográfico da história oficial. Revista de Geografia. Recife. V. 9, 1993, p. 25 - 66.

DABAT, C. Rufino.Notas sobre a transferência dos conceitos de ‘feudalismo’ e de ‘modo de produção feudal’ aplicados a regiões nãoeuropeias. Recife: Cadernos de Estudos Sociais, vol. 11 n. 2 jul./dez. de 1995, pp. 199-228.

DAVIS, Mike. Holocaustos coloniais. Clima, fome e imperialismo na formação do Terceiro Mundo. Tradução de Alda Porto. Rio de Janeiro: Record, 2002.

DIRLIK, Arif. Marxism in the Chinese Revolution. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 2005.

FEUERWERKER, Albert. Chinese History in Marxian Dress. FEUERWERKER, Albert (Ed.) History in Communist China. Cambridge Mass.: MIT Press, 1968, pp. 14-44.

FOURQUIN, Guy. Senhorio e feudalidade na Idade Média. Lisboa: Ed. 70, 1987.

GALBIATI, Fernando. P’eng P’ai, and the Hai-lu-feng Soviet. Stanford : Stanford Univ. Press, 1985.

GAULARD, Mylène. Le mode de production asiatique et la Chine. Retour sur la pertinence d´un concept biaisé. Revue d´Histoire de la pensée économique. Déc., No 2, 2018, pp. 39-64.

GERNET, Jacques. Le monde chinois. Paris: A. Colin, 1972.

GODELIER, Maurice. Le mode de production asiatique : un concept stimulant, mais qui reste d´une portée analytique limitée. Actuel Marx, 1991/2 (No 10), pp. 181-199.

LEWIS, Gregory Scott. Shades of red and white. The life and political career of Ji Chaoding 1903-1963. Arizona State University, 1999.

LIU, Yanyi. The Origins of The Chinese Communist Party and the Role Played by Soviet Russia and the Comintern. PhD York: Univ. of York. 2000.

MAMIGONIAN, Armem. A China e o marxismo: Li Dazhao, Mao e Deng. DEL ROIO, Marcos (Org.) Marxismo e Oriente: quando as periferias tornam-se centros.São Paulo: Ícone, 2008, pp. 145-200.

MAO Tse-tung. Política. Org. Eder SADER. São Paulo : Ática, 1982.

MAO Tse-Tung. La révolution chinoise et le parti communiste chinois. Oeuvres Choisies. Vol II. Pekin : Editions en Langues Étrangères, 1967.

MEISNER, Maurice. Li Ta-chao and the Origins of Chinese Marxism. Cambridge Mass.: Harvard UP, 1967.

MUSTO, Marcello. O Velho Marx. Uma biografia de seus últimos anos [1881-1883]. São Paulo: Boitempo, 2018.

PERROT, Dominique & PREISWERK, Roy. Ethnocentrisme et Histoire. L’Afrique, l’Amérique indienne et l’Asie dans les manuels occidentaux. Paris: Anthropos, 1975.

POMERANZ, Kenneth. A grande divergência. A China, a Europa e a Construção da Economia Mundial Moderna. Lisboa: 70, 2013.

REGO, Débora Lopes do. Águas temidas, águas desejadas: a gestão das águas do rio Amarelo do engenheiro Pan Jixun, 1565-1580. UFPE: Depto História, 2016.

RIST, Gilbert. Le développement. Histoire d’une croyance occidentale. Paris: Presses de Sciences Politiques, 1997.

ROY, Manabendra Nath. Revolucion y contrarrevolucion en China. Mexico : Roca, 1972.

SAICH, Tony. The Chinese Communist Party during the Era of the Comintern (1919-1943). Article prepared for Juergen Rojahn, Comintern and National Communist Parties Project. Amsterdam: International Institute of Social History. https://ash.harvard.edu/anthony-saich-articles. Acessado em 04.07.19.

SCHULTE-TENCKHOFF, Isabelle. La vue portée au loin. Une histoire de la pensée anthropologique. Lausanne : Ed. d’En Bas, 1985.

SERGE, Victor. 1927-29 La révolution chinoise. Paris : Savelli, 1977.

SOFRI, Gianni. O problema da revolução socialista nos países atrasados. HOBSBAWM Eric (Ed.) História do Marxismo. Vol VIII. O Marxismo na Época da Terceira Internacional: o Novo Capitalismo, o Imperialismo, o Terceiro Mundo. Rio de Janeiro: Paz e Terra, 1987.

SOFRI Gianni. O modo de produção asiático. História de uma controvérsia marxista. Rio de Janeiro: Paz e Terra, 1977.

STRONG, Anna Louise. A China na luta pela liberdade. Rio de Janeiro: Ed. Calvino, 1944.

STUDER, Brigitte. Reisende der Weltrevolution. Eine Globalgeschichte der Kommunistischen Internationale. Berlin: Suhrkampf, 2021.

TÖKEI, Ferenc. Zur Frage der asiatischen Produktionsweise. Berlin: Luchterhand, 1969.

VISHNYAKOVA-AKIMOVA, Vera Vladimirovna. Two Years in Revolutionary China, 1925-1927. Cambridge Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1971.

WALTER, Georges & HUCHI-HSI. Ils étaient cent mille. La longue marche. Paris : J. C. Lattès, 1982

WANG, Gungwu. Juxtaposing past and present in China today. China Quarterly, March 1975, N. 61, pp. 1-24.

WITTFOGEL, Karl. Le despotisme oriental. Tradução de Micheline Pouteau. Paris: Minuit, 1959.

ZOU Jinwen & Song Lizhi. Chinese Economics Students in the USA. Ying Ma, et al. Thoughts on Economic Development in China. New York: Routledge, 2013.

Published

2024-12-28

How to Cite

DABAT, C. Ji Chaoding’s Key Economic Areas: a discreet challenge from a Chinese Marxist to Eurocentrism in historiography. História da Historiografia: International Journal of Theory and History of Historiography, Ouro Preto, v. 17, p. 1–29, 2024. DOI: 10.15848/hh.v17.2183. Disponível em: https://revistahh.emnuvens.com.br/revista/article/view/2183. Acesso em: 4 jan. 2025.

Issue

Section

Dossiê ''Tradições, temporalidade e narrativa na historiografia chinesa''